Avoid Contractor Scams: 4 Red Flags That Cost Investors Thousands
TLDRI said five at the start of the source video, then corrected myself because I only had four. They are gray scope, loss-leader change orders, the contractor black hole, and licensed-trade permit pressure. The response is clearer scope, smaller task breakdowns, deadlines, and realistic licensed-trade bids.
Table of Contents
- The Criminal Stuff First
- Scam 1: The Abe Lincoln
- Scam 2: The Loss Leader
- Scam 3: The Black Hole
- Scam 4: The Hostage
- The Real Prevention
- FAQ
The Criminal Stuff First
The recording opens with a news clip about a contractor convicted in a large theft scheme. The lesson then separates deliberate theft from the lower-level contractor patterns I have seen directly.
- Material heist: your contractor buys material for your job, then uses it on another house.
- Swap out: he tells you the hvac is broken, charges you for a new one, takes the good one, and sells it to another investor. Ross says he caught one contractor doing this and found a shed or warehouse full of barely used HVAC units.
- Photoshop: an out-of-state investor told Ross that most of the bill was paid and only a few items remained. At the site, the job had barely begun. The contractor had sent edited or tightly framed photos that appeared to show the flooring and cabinets complete.
- Cash and dash: you pay upfront, he never comes back.
The Cash and DashRoss’s rule is not to pay labor ahead of the work. Use clear checkpoints, inspect what is complete, and keep enough unpaid to bring the crew back. Any material deposit or other advance should be explicit and documented rather than treated as completed labor.
These are the malicious ones. Real, but rare. The everyday scams do more damage across a career because they look like normal business.
Scam 1: The Abe Lincoln
This one starts with the most dangerous phrase in real estate. “Don’t worry, man. We’ll just shake on it.”
Ross compares that to handing a bank teller $2,000 in cash and leaving without a receipt. You would ask for proof that the bank took the money. A job scope also needs a record both sides can check.
You want to build relationships. You should. But a contractor who knows more than you can see blood in the water. New investor, maybe out of state, maybe a first flip. He talks in ambiguous terms on a scope of work, and when something comes up later, he gaslights you into thinking you already agreed.
I got caught in this one. Cost-plus arrangement, loose scope. He told me we had a conversation where I said “if you find something, just go ahead.” What I actually said was “if you find something, let me know what it is going to cost so I have options.” He tore out a full bathroom because of some rot, redid it, and handed me the bill. What am I going to do, refuse to pay? The work was done.
Fix: Scope of Work in Three Ways
I do not sign contracts with contractors. Contracts add friction, and you are never going to hunt a guy down in court over a few grand. Instead, I set up the scope of work in three ways on the same walk-through.
- Written. I usually write the scope in advance.
- Verbal. We walk the job site together and confirm.
- Video. I walk the same property with a camera rolling, saying what is going to happen in each room.
Then I send the written and the video when I ask for a bid. “Give me your bid based on this.” The three records give both sides something concrete to review if the scope is questioned later.
This is Ross’s low-friction process from the source. It is not a claim that contracts are never useful or required. Written scope notes and video do not replace any agreement, notice, license, or consumer rule that applies to the job.
A gray scope of work is what lets a contractor turn a mistake into your bill.
Scam 2: The Loss Leader
Grocery stores put two porterhouse steaks for the price of one on the end cap to get you in the door. The melons inside are triple price. The bottled water is 100 times what tap water costs. The steak is the loss leader.
Contractors do the same thing. The initial bid comes in tight, maybe 0 to 5 percent margin, sometimes at cost. They know that once they are in the walls, change orders are where the real markup lives. Fifty, sixty, seventy percent on a change order. That is where they make the year.
Fix: Break Change Orders Into Tasks
Every change order carries what I call the fear tax. The contractor is not always being malicious about it. Sometimes they are scared too. “Termites in the wall” sounds bad and unknown, so both sides pad the number.
You kill the fear tax by breaking the job down into tasks.
| Job Name | Tasks |
|---|---|
| Termite rot in wall | Demo, cleanup, reframing, drywall, paint, termite treatment |
Now each task has material, labor, and a reasonable markup. No fear tax over the top.
Then you walk it with the contractor as if you are trying to learn. “So the demo, that is probably a half day, right? Not a high-skill guy.” “The framing, that is maybe another day. Material is 50 to 100 bucks, it is just a wall.” “Drywall. Paint. And we are calling a termite company for the treatment, right? What do they charge?”
By the end, you are looking at the original 10,000 dollar bid and you say: “I am not seeing how we got to ten thousand. Am I missing something?”
Usually they come back with 3,000 and a story about what they were originally thinking. Sometimes they hold at a higher number, and that is fine, but you do not haggle. You exit gracefully. “I actually have a crew that does nothing but termite work, their prices are insane on this specific thing. I am going to call them and see.” Then you bring in the specialist. Your relationship capital with the first guy stays intact for the next job.
Pro TipWhen a contractor brings a big number for something scary, do not fight the number first. Clarify the job definition and break it into ordinary tasks so the labor, materials, trade requirements, and uncertainty are easier to test.
Scam 3: The Black Hole
You hire a guy, he works for a week, then you cannot get a hold of him. He has not fully ghosted, because that would be easier to deal with. He just barely holds on. A week goes by with no one on site. Right when you are about to fire him, he shows for one day. Then another week. He drops in again just before you cut him loose. That is the black hole.
Fix: The Reasonable Ultimatum
Usually you are pissed when you have to have this conversation. Leave the anger at the door. Take deep breaths. Then be direct, but fair.
“You are a 1099 subcontractor, not an employee. I cannot tell you where to be every day. But it has been a couple weeks and I am bleeding money on this thing. I need to get somebody else in here if this does not move. But you had the initial deal with me, so I want to give you the shot. I need the floors done by next Friday. That is more time than you need. If I show up Friday and the floors are not done, I am cutting you loose. We settle up on the work you have already done. No problem.”
Don’t be soft. Don’t be fragile. Tell him exactly what is going to happen. Direct, but fair.
Scam 4: The Hostage
This one hits with licensed trades. Mechanical, electrical, plumbing. The guys who pull permits.
Three bids come in on a rewire. Two come in at 13 or 14 grand. The third comes in at 8 grand. You ask him how he is so cheap. “Those other guys don’t know what they’re talking about. You don’t need a panel, don’t need a meter, don’t need to rewire that.” You hire him. He does the work. Inspector shows up and says you need a panel, a meter, and a full rewire.
Now the guy is back with another 8 grand bid because the inspector said so. Total: 16 grand. You could have just hired the first guy for 14. But he already pulled the permit, and getting him off of it is a whole city process. You are stuck.
Whether he was malicious or just dumb, the result is the same.
Fix: Knowledge and Presence
- Ross limits his own buying to properties in his backyard so he can be present. That is his operating choice, not a rule that no remote owner can invest.
- Gain the knowledge of what the real scope actually needs to be. If you do not know what a rewire involves, you are the prey.
If I am acting as my own GC and hiring the subcontractors directly, I have to know enough to question a bid that is far below the others. A low licensed-trade bid can become more expensive if the omitted work is later required.
Key ConceptKnowledge times experience equals skills. Skills are the true wealth. Once you have them stacked up, you stop being the mark.
The Real Prevention
Most scams are not malicious. They come from a contractor being overwhelmed, disorganized, or scared. The fear tax goes both ways. The black hole happens because the guy has three other job sites falling apart. The loss leader happens because his residential competition is doing it too.
The prevention is structural. Write the scope three ways. Break every change order into tasks. Hand out ultimatums early and clearly. Pay on checkpoints, never in front. Build the knowledge yourself so you can call it when something does not add up.
Some of the best friends I have are contractors I work with. That is not in spite of this stuff, it is because of it. Clean structure makes a clean relationship.
FAQ
Why does the title say four when the original introduction said five?
I said five, then corrected the count in the recording: I only had four. My bad.
What do I do if a contractor refuses to break down a change order into tasks?
Break the scary label into the actual demo, framing, material, drywall, paint, treatment, and labor involved. The task list gives you something concrete to price and discuss.
Can the black hole ultimatum damage the relationship long-term?
Give a specific deadline with enough time to finish the named work. If it is not done, settle up for completed work and move on.
I just started flipping. How do I hire licensed trades without getting the hostage treatment?
Do not accept an unusually low licensed-trade bid without reconciling it with the real scope and permit path. In the source example, required work was omitted from the low bid, and the same contractor had already pulled the permit when the additional work surfaced. That left the owner with fewer practical options and a higher total price.
Is it worth hiring a general contractor to avoid all this?
The source does not make a universal rule about whether to hire a general contractor. Its point is that suspiciously low licensed-trade bids can become expensive when permits and completion depend on the same person.